Washington , US- September 8, 2025
New Gaza proposal said to include ‘highly significant guarantees’ against Israel resuming war amid talks. A new American-backed proposal for a ceasefire and hostage-release deal in Gaza reportedly contains “highly significant guarantees” that Israel will not resume its military offensive as long as negotiations for a permanent end to the conflict are underway.
The details, reported by Hebrew media outlets, appear to be a direct attempt to address a core demand from Hamas, which has consistently sought assurances that a truce would not simply be a temporary pause before a renewed Israeli assault.
Headline Points:
* Crucial Guarantee: The new US proposal reportedly offers “highly significant guarantees” from the American side that Israel will not resume fighting while ceasefire negotiations continue.
* Hamas’s Core Demand: The guarantees directly address a key sticking point for Hamas, which has repeatedly stated it will not release all hostages without concrete assurances of a permanent end to the war.
* Presidential Involvement: The proposal is said to be backed by a personal guarantee from US President Donald Trump, a move seen as an unprecedented attempt to build trust with Hamas.
* First-Day Hostage Release: The deal reportedly calls for the immediate release of all remaining hostages, both living and deceased, in the first 48 hours of the truce.
* Israeli Concessions: In exchange, Israel would reportedly release thousands of Palestinian prisoners and withdraw its forces from certain positions in Gaza, including an immediate halt to its conquest of Gaza City.
* Skepticism Remains: Despite the new details, sources on both sides remain skeptical, with some Hamas leaders questioning the reliability of US guarantees and some Israeli officials doubting Hamas’s willingness to release all hostages at once.
The new proposal, which was reportedly conveyed to Hamas by mediators, is a critical step in the ongoing efforts to secure a deal and end the nearly two-year-long war. The guarantees are a direct response to Hamas’s long-standing fear that a temporary ceasefire would allow Israel to regroup and then resume its military operations, as it did during a previous truce in March.
The specific nature of the guarantees is what sets this proposal apart. According to Israeli news reports, the ceasefire would remain in effect for as long as negotiations to end the war continue, with President Trump offering his personal assurance that Israel would adhere to the terms. This personal pledge is a powerful tool designed to overcome the deep-seated distrust between the two sides.
For its part, Hamas has said it is “thoroughly reviewing” the latest proposal but has not yet given an official response. The group’s leadership is reportedly divided, with some members arguing that the American-backed deal contains “traps and pitfalls.” Their primary concern remains the lack of a clear, binding commitment from Israel to a full and permanent withdrawal from the Gaza Strip.
Meanwhile, sources close to Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu have stated that Israel is “seriously considering” the proposal. However, hardline elements within the Israeli government and public have pushed back against the terms, particularly the proposed release of thousands of Palestinian prisoners, including some serving life sentences for involvement in attacks.
The proposal also includes significant concessions from Israel. Reports indicate that under the deal, the Israeli Defense Forces (IDF) would call off their conquest of Gaza City and would withdraw from their current positions. This would allow for a significant rearrangement of forces and a more comprehensive flow of humanitarian aid into the besieged territory.
As the international community watches with bated breath, the coming days will be a test of whether these new, “highly significant guarantees” are enough to bridge the chasm of mistrust and bring an end to one of the most destructive conflicts in the region’s history. The stakes are immense, not just for the hostages and the people of Gaza, but for the stability of the entire Middle East.
